The Pittsburgh Pirates could soon be required to spend significantly more money on their roster. But thanks to Major League Baseball's latest collective bargaining proposal, owner Bob Nutting might have another year before anyone can force him to do it.
MLB owners submitted a revised salary cap and floor proposal Tuesday that would delay implementation of the system until 2028 rather than 2027. The revised proposal includes a $258.2 million salary cap and a $180.2 million salary floor, both increases from the owners' previous proposal of $245.3 million and $171.2 million, respectively.
Pittsburgh is among 12 organizations that would need to increase spending to meet the proposed floor. Collectively, those teams would have to add approximately $636 million in payroll, based on their 2026 luxury-tax figures.
For Pirates fans who have spent years watching Nutting operate one of baseball's lowest payrolls, a mandatory spending requirement might sound like a long-overdue solution. But even under the owners' preferred system, Nutting wouldn't have to meet that requirement in 2027.
MLB's new proposals to the MLBPA, per @JeffPassan and @BNightengale:
— Talkin' Baseball (@TalkinBaseball_) November 3, 2026
-Salary cap starts in 2028 so teams have time to prepare
-Cap of $258.2M and floor of $180.2M (last proposal was $245.3M and $171.2M)
-$1 million minimum salary (up from $780K)
-Free agency after five years… pic.twitter.com/5DRr3lp6HG
Pirates can't afford to wait until 2028 for Bob Nutting to start spending
MLB's explanation for the delay is that organizations need additional time to adjust their financial commitments. Teams currently spending above the proposed cap would have to shed substantial payroll, while those below the floor would need time to increase theirs.
That reasoning makes some sense from a logistical standpoint. But for an organization like Pittsburgh, which has repeatedly demonstrated little willingness to approach even a moderately competitive payroll, the delay offers another opportunity to maintain the status quo.
The timing couldn't be worse for the Pirates, who are coming off their first winning season since 2018. They have one of baseball's most exciting collections of young talent, but they also have significant roster deficiencies that prevented them from reaching the postseason.
Brandon Lowe's potential departure would create another hole in an already imperfect lineup. Pittsburgh needs to address its infield, improve its bullpen and add pitching depth. Those problems aren't going to solve themselves while ownership waits for a new economic system.
In fact, there's no guarantee that system will ever materialize. The MLB Players Association remains firmly opposed to a salary cap, and the current collective bargaining agreement expires December 1, raising the possibility of another lockout.
Either way, the Pirates shouldn't need a salary floor to justify spending money on a team that finally appears capable of competing.
Brewers' World Series championship exposes flaw in Pirates' spending excuses
Perhaps the most revealing detail of MLB's latest proposal is another organization included among the 12 teams that would need to increase payroll: the 2026 World Series champion Milwaukee Brewers.
Milwaukee built a championship roster without the benefit of a mandatory spending requirement, demonstrating that small-market organizations can compete under baseball's existing economic structure. That doesn't mean MLB's financial disparities aren't real, or that a salary floor couldn't benefit smaller-market teams. But it does make it harder to argue that those disparities excuse years of insufficient investment.
The Brewers have consistently found ways to maximize their resources, develop talent and supplement their roster when necessary. Meanwhile, Pittsburgh has spent most of the past decade struggling to assemble a competitive team.
The comparison is particularly uncomfortable now that the Pirates have a young core worth building around. Milwaukee has already demonstrated what's possible. Pittsburgh shouldn't need another two years to figure it out.
Another important wrinkle is that under the latest proposal, teams could initially operate at just 90% of the proposed floor in 2028, provided they make up the difference over a three-year period. That would allow an initial payroll as low as approximately $162.2 million under the proposed rules. For Pirates fans, that's hardly reassuring.
Ultimately, the biggest problem with MLB's latest proposal isn't necessarily the delay itself. It's the possibility that Pittsburgh's ownership will use the ongoing labor negotiations as another justification for avoiding the investments this roster needs right now.
Nutting has an opportunity to demonstrate that the Pirates are serious about building on their first winning season in eight years. He doesn't need permission from MLB's owners to do that. He doesn't need a salary floor, either.
And if he's unwilling to invest in this team until a collective bargaining agreement forces him to, Pirates fans have every reason to question whether winning has ever been his top priority.
