Dodgers owner's financial scrutiny should have Pirates demanding answers from MLB

For years, Pittsburgh Pirates fans have been told that the Los Angeles Dodgers aren't the problem.

Spend smarter. Draft better. Develop better. Extend your own players. Stop making excuses about market size.

There's plenty of truth in that criticism, particularly when it comes to Bob Nutting and a Pirates organization that has too often treated spending money like an occupational hazard. But there has also always been something absurd about pretending Pittsburgh and Los Angeles are participating in the same economic competition.

Now, the financial empire behind the Dodgers is attracting attention from people far more powerful than baseball fans complaining about payroll disparity. According to the Wall Street Journal, federal prosecutors and the SEC are examining financial dealings involving companies tied to Dodgers principal owner Mark Walter, including billions of dollars in loans involving insurers and affiliated businesses.

Walter hasn't been charged with a crime, and his company has denied wrongdoing. There is currently no evidence that Walter illegally funded the Dodgers' payroll or that Los Angeles' spending violated MLB rules. The investigation shouldn't be transformed into a retroactive explanation for every Shohei Ohtani, Yoshinobu Yamamoto or Kyle Tucker contract.

But MLB shouldn't expect fans in Pittsburgh or other small markets to simply shrug, either. The Dodgers' seemingly bottomless resources have helped create one of the strangest competitive landscapes in American professional sports. Los Angeles can make a mistake that would cripple the Pirates for years and treat it like an inconvenience.

The Dodgers can give Tucker four years and $240 million and survive if he has the worst season of his career. Edwin Díaz can sign for three years and $69 million and stumble badly, and Los Angeles can still possess enough talent and financial flexibility to remain a championship favorite. The Pirates don't get that luxury.

If Pittsburgh makes one expensive mistake, it can become the justification for two offseasons of bargain hunting. If Bryan Reynolds declines, Mitch Keller's extension doesn't work out or another significant contract goes sideways, there isn't another $200 million player walking through the door.

That's why the Pirates have to hit on practically everything. Paul Skenes has to be a superstar. Bubba Chandler has to develop. Braxton Ashcraft has to stick. Konnor Griffin has to become a foundational player. Young players have to outperform their salaries while they're inexpensive, because Pittsburgh knows the clock starts ticking toward arbitration and free agency almost immediately.

And that's exactly why Pirates fans should be interested in what happens with Walter. Not because they should celebrate someone else's legal problems. Not because an investigation suddenly makes Dodgers championships illegitimate, but because MLB has spent years insisting that its enormous financial disparities are sustainable while one franchise has assembled a roster under economic conditions completely foreign to teams like Pittsburgh.

MLB's new CBA must help Pirates compete in same economic stratosphere as Dodgers

Walter's situation should invite some basic questions for MLB. What financial scrutiny does the league conduct on ownership groups? Does anything uncovered by federal investigators concern MLB? Could Walter's broader financial problems eventually affect the Dodgers? What protections exist when the wealth supporting one of baseball's most powerful franchises becomes the subject of this kind of investigation?

Walter recently agreed to sell the Lakers amid a push for liquidity while his businesses face regulatory scrutiny. That doesn't mean the Dodgers are next, but it does mean MLB should be prepared to explain whether any of this matters to one of its flagship franchises.

Pirates fans deserve those answers. When the current collective bargaining agreement expires, they also need a system that acknowledges the sport's financial reality. That probably means some combination of stronger revenue sharing, payroll restraints and, critically for Pittsburgh, a meaningful salary floor. Because Pirates ownership shouldn't be allowed to hide behind the Dodgers, either.

Nutting has routinely spent too little. Pittsburgh's market doesn't justify acting as though a competitive payroll is impossible, especially now that the Pirates have Skenes, Griffin and a young core that should make this a win-now window. Any new economic system that limits the Dodgers without forcing the Pirates to invest would simply exchange one competitive-balance problem for another.

The Dodgers shouldn't have access to a completely different financial universe than Pittsburgh, and the Pirates shouldn't be permitted to use that disparity as an excuse for failing to spend.

Walter's investigation hasn't proven that anything about the Dodgers' success was improper. But after years of watching Los Angeles spend amounts of money that seem fictional from Pittsburgh, Pirates fans are perfectly justified in asking MLB how this system works, how closely it's being monitored, and whether the league really believes this is what competitive balance is supposed to look like.

The Dodgers' endless supply of money has always seemed almost too good to be true. MLB now owes its other 29 fanbases some reassurance that it wasn't.

Add us as a preferred source on Google

Follow